AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home iLIVER Article
PDF (1.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Meta-analysis | Open Access

Efficacy and complications of transarterial chemoembolization alone or in combination with different protocols for hepatocellular carcinoma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Jingxin Yana,b,c,dManjun Dengc,dTing LieChanghao DongfMinglan WanggShunyu Konga,bYingxing Guoa( )Haining Fanc,d( )
Department of Interventional Therapy, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China
Department of Postgraduate, Qinghai University, Xining, China
Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China
Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Hydatid Disease Research, Xining, China
Department of Postgraduate, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
Department of Postgraduate, Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background and aims

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for most intermediate-to-advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma. With the ongoing development of interventional therapies, TACE in combination with different protocols is being explored. A network meta-analysis to collect recent evidence in this field is required.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database, Cochrane Library, and Wanfang database from their inception to May 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported TACE in combination with different protocols for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Results

In total, 67 RCTs assessing eight combination treatments were included. The quality of primary outcomes was from moderate to low. The Bayesian network meta-analysis confirmed that TACE combined with iodine-125 seed implantation had the highest probability of 1-year survival rate and TACE combined with sorafenib had the highest probability of 2-year survival rate. TACE alone had the highest probability of incidence of fever, TACE combined with sorafenib had the highest probability of incidence of pain and TACE combined with percutaneous ethanol injection had the highest probability of incidence of nausea and vomiting.

Conclusion

This Bayesian network meta-analysis found that TACE combined with iodine-125 seed and TACE combined with sorafenib may benefit patients in terms of 1-year survival and 2-year survival, respectively. To confirm this conclusion, high-quality and well-designed RCTs with a larger sample size are needed.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
iliver-2-2-130_ESM1.docx (15.6 KB)
iliver-2-2-130_ESM2.docx (15.3 KB)
iliver-2-2-130_ESM3.docx (15.1 KB)
iliver-2-2-130_ESM4.docx (15.1 KB)
iliver-2-2-130_ESM5.docx (15.2 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
iLIVER
Pages 130-141

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Yan J, Deng M, Li T, et al. Efficacy and complications of transarterial chemoembolization alone or in combination with different protocols for hepatocellular carcinoma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. iLIVER, 2023, 2(2): 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iliver.2023.03.002

1287

Views

29

Downloads

4

Crossref

4

Scopus

Received: 24 September 2022
Revised: 26 February 2023
Accepted: 05 March 2023
Published: 24 March 2023
© 2023 The Author(s). Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).